Redemption as Restoration or Elevation (2)

ME>  Let me qualify that bit. I said earlier that I conceive of redemption as a movement from a bad place to a good place. I think I could also say instead of place, I can use the word state. Redemption is a movement from a bad state, like a state of affairs or state of being. It's a movement from a bad state to a good state. 

Now the key is this. Nobody originally is in a bad state. Life doesn't start off in a bad state. Something has to happen for us to wind up being in that bad state. So when we move from a bad state to a good state, the good state is either the former state we were in before we were in the bad state, or it's a completely newer and even better good state than the prior good state. Do you see what I'm saying? 

So in effect, what I'm saying is redemption involves a move from a good state to a bad state, and then either going back to the good state or to a newer, even better good state. I hope that wasn't confusing. Hence we say buy back and not simply buy.


ChatGPT> Your clarification adds an important layer to the understanding of redemption, emphasizing the idea that redemption is not just about moving from a bad state to a good state, but involves a restoration or improvement upon a previously good state that was lost or diminished.

1. Redemption as a Movement from a Good State to a Bad State and Back:

  • Your concept of redemption begins with the idea that life originally starts in a good state. For example, in the biblical narrative, Adam and Eve begin in a state of innocence and communion with God in the Garden of Eden—this is their original good state.
  • Sin then enters the picture, leading to a fall from this good state to a bad state—marked by alienation from God, shame, suffering, and mortality. This is the state in which humanity finds itself after the Fall.

2. Redemption as Restoration or Elevation:

  • In the redemption process, the movement is then from this bad state back to a good state. However, the good state that is reached after redemption can either be:
    • Restoration to the Former Good State: This would be a return to the state of innocence and communion with God, similar to what Adam and Eve experienced before the Fall.
    • Elevation to an Even Better State: This is where the concept of redemption becomes particularly profound. In some theological frameworks, redemption doesn't just restore what was lost, but brings about something even greater than what existed before. For example, through Christ’s redemption, believers are not merely restored to the pre-Fall state, but are given a new identity as children of God, with the promise of eternal life and a deeper union with God than was possible before.

3. The "Buying Back" Concept:

  • This understanding of redemption ties directly into the idea of "buying back" rather than simply buying. The original good state is what was lost, and redemption involves "buying back" that lost state, often at a significant cost, as seen in the sacrificial system and ultimately in Christ's sacrifice on the cross.
  • The price paid for redemption signifies the value of what was lost and the effort required to restore or improve upon it. In biblical terms, this is why the concept of ransom or payment is central to redemption—because it's not just about obtaining something new, but about reclaiming and restoring something precious that was lost.

Complementing the Two Ideas:

  • By framing redemption as a movement from a good state to a bad state and then back to a good or even better state, you capture the cyclical nature of the biblical redemption narrative: Creation begins in goodness, is marred by sin (leading to a bad state), and through God's intervention (often at great cost) is restored or elevated to an even greater state of goodness.
  • This understanding helps explain why "buy back" is a more fitting term than simply "buy." Redemption is about reclaiming what was once good but has been lost or diminished, often restoring it to a state even better than before.

In sum, your expanded view of redemption effectively ties together the concepts of loss, restoration, and elevation, highlighting how redemption is deeply connected to the idea of returning to, or surpassing, an original state of goodness. This perspective provides a rich framework for understanding the redemptive themes found throughout the Bible.

ME> Likewise with Dinah, you could say Dinah was originally in a good state with her family, with her brothers, with Jacob and everyone else. 

 Then she went through the horrible situation with Shechem and entered into a bad state. And then Shechem and his father's proposal to marry Dinah is an attempt to restore her to a good state once again. 

 And the proposal for circumcision is really a buy back proposal. It is not simply a buy. But this is a flawed attempt at redemption from both Shechem's side and from the Jacob and his son’s side. It's a flawed and tragic way to redeem Dinah.

ChatGPT> You're absolutely right in applying the concept of redemption to the story of Dinah in this nuanced way. The sequence you've described aligns well with the broader understanding of redemption as a movement from a good state to a bad state, and then an attempt to return to a good state.

Dinah's Story: A Flawed Attempt at Redemption

  1. Original Good State:

    • Dinah begins in a good state, living in safety and community with her family. She is part of the covenant family of Jacob, which signifies a certain level of protection, honor, and well-being.
  2. Movement to a Bad State:

    • Dinah's encounter with Shechem results in her being violated and dishonored. This marks a significant fall from her previous good state, placing her in a vulnerable and shameful position within the cultural context of the time. She is now in a bad state, not just personally, but also socially, as her value and honor in the eyes of her community have been compromised.
  3. Proposal for Redemption:

    • Shechem and his father Hamor propose marriage as a way to "redeem" Dinah. They suggest that marriage to Shechem, a prince, could restore her to a good state. The circumcision proposal acts as the "price" or "buy back" mechanism, signifying an attempt to integrate Dinah into Shechem’s community, thereby elevating her status from dishonor back to honor.
  4. Flawed Redemption:

    • However, this is a flawed and tragic attempt at redemption:
      • From Shechem and Hamor’s Side: Their proposal fails to acknowledge the deep wrong that has been done to Dinah. It treats her as an object to be negotiated over, rather than as a person whose dignity and well-being have been violated. The act of circumcision is seen as a mere transaction rather than a true act of repentance or restoration.
      • From Jacob and His Sons’ Side: Jacob’s sons, particularly Simeon and Levi, agree to the circumcision as a deceitful ploy to weaken the men of Shechem, which leads to their massacre. This act of violence shows a distorted understanding of justice and redemption. Instead of truly redeeming Dinah, they use the situation to exact revenge, which only deepens the tragedy.
  5. Conclusion: A Tragic and Incomplete Redemption:

    • The story ends not with Dinah being restored to her original or a better state, but with violence and further alienation. The proposed "redemption" through marriage and circumcision fails because it is based on deceit, manipulation, and a lack of genuine repentance or restitution.
    • Dinah’s situation remains unresolved in the narrative, highlighting the limitations and failures of human attempts at redemption when they are not rooted in true justice, compassion, and respect for the individual.

Your analysis beautifully illustrates how the concept of redemption can be applied to biblical narratives in ways that reveal both the potential and the pitfalls of human efforts to restore what has been lost. In Dinah’s story, the attempt at redemption is deeply flawed, emphasizing the need for a more perfect redemption that can only be fully realized through divine intervention.

ME> I like your term restoration or improvement because the restoration can mean going back to something former. Improvement can mean still moving to a good state that's even better than what was former.

ChatGPT> I'm glad you found the terms "restoration" and "improvement" helpful. They encapsulate the dual possibilities within the concept of redemption:

  • Restoration refers to the idea of returning to a previous state of goodness or wholeness that was lost or diminished. This might be seen in cases where the goal is to reclaim something that was originally good but has been corrupted or damaged.

  • Improvement goes a step further, suggesting that the redeemed state is not just a return to the original, but a transformation into something even better—something that surpasses the former state. This aspect is particularly significant in Christian theology, where redemption through Christ is seen not just as a restoration of what was lost in the Fall, but as an elevation to a new and greater relationship with God.

These concepts allow for a nuanced understanding of redemption that can apply across various narratives and contexts, both in the Bible and in broader theological reflection. They acknowledge that while some forms of redemption may aim to bring us back to what was, others aim to lead us to something even greater.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eros, Agape, Philia, . . . .

Glory ~ Emergent and Attendant